Implementation

Begin with one category and one defensible decision.

Set the qualification rule, evidence requirement, and approval ownership for a real supplier case before expanding the governance model.

PILOT CASEOne categoryOne supplierOne decisionThen scale the policy

Implementation sequence

Four stages with an operating result.

The first implementation should prove that evidence and approval remain connected, then scale the same governance pattern.

01 / Frame

Define category ownership

Name the category, code, accountable owner, risk tier, and the supplier population in scope.

Result · owned intake boundary
02 / Require

Set qualification evidence

Choose questionnaire scope, assessment areas, document types, expiry expectations, and target decision dates.

Result · explicit evidence standard
03 / Separate

Assign the four roles

Separate category management, assessment, risk review, and independent approval rights.

Result · controlled responsibility
04 / Prove

Run one complete case

Take a prospective supplier from request through evidence, risk rationale, and the recorded final decision.

Result · defensible decision trace

What to prepare

Bring the policy and the evidence you already trust.

The first pass needs enough operating detail to distinguish category risk, required evidence, findings, and decision authority.

Supplier foundationSupplier names, codes, country, current state, and category assignment
Category policyCategory owner, risk tier, required questionnaire, assessment, and documents
Decision processRequest owner, assessor, risk reviewer, approver, and target time
Outcome rulesApprove, conditional approval, rejection, notes, and status mapping
Public site

Discover and decide

Product, process, implementation, pricing, and support information live here.

opens
ERP.ai

Configure and operate

Supplier records, role rights, qualification evidence, workflows, and decisions run there.

First implementation

Start with one supplier case that matters.

Sign up
Made with Proto